Apple's requirement for app developers to use in-app purchases (IAP) and restrict directing users outside the App Store for purchases has a complex impact on both user experience and payment security. Here's a breakdown of the potential effects:
User Experience:
Negatives:
- Extra Steps: Users might find it inconvenient to be redirected outside the app to complete purchases. This disrupts the app's flow and adds extra steps compared to a seamless in-app purchase.
- Security Concerns: Some users might be wary of entering payment details on an external website, especially if it's unfamiliar. This could lead to cart abandonment or a negative perception of the app and its developer.
- Limited Payment Options: Developers might offer alternative payment methods or promotions on their websites that aren't available through Apple's IAP system. Users who prefer these options would be restricted.
Positives:
- Transparency: Users might appreciate the transparency of knowing they're purchasing directly from the developer and not through Apple.
- Potentially Lower Prices: In some cases, developers might offer lower prices on their websites to avoid Apple's IAP commission fees. This could benefit users.
Payment Security:
Negatives:
- Potential for Phishing: If users aren't careful, they could be directed to a fake website impersonating the developer's website, leading to compromised payment information.
- Unfamiliarity with Security Measures: Users might be unsure about the security measures in place on the developer's website, especially compared to Apple's established App Store payment system.
Positives:
- User Control: Users have more control over their payment information as they're entering it directly on the developer's website.
Overall:
The impact on user experience seems to be more on the negative side due to the disruption and potential security concerns with external websites. For payment security, it depends on the user's awareness and the developer's website security practices.
.webp)
-1.webp)
